<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>California Computer Services, Serving Sacramento, Roseville, Rocklin, Elk Grove, Auburn, Fair Oaks, Citrus Heights, Folsom, Orangevale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calcompserv.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calcompserv.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>360-degree Camera from ACTi.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/360-degree-camera-from-acti?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=360-degree-camera-from-acti</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/360-degree-camera-from-acti#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfiffick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever wished to have full video coverage of a 164 feet wide lobby or retail store by using just one camera? One would require an extremely wide viewing angle that can have everything in the field of view and resolution big enough to maintain all the viewed details. ACTi introduces a new 4-Megapixel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever wished to have full video coverage of a 164 feet wide lobby or retail store by using just one camera? One would require an extremely wide viewing angle that can have everything in the field of view and resolution big enough to maintain all the viewed details. ACTi introduces a new 4-Megapixel hemispheric camera KCM-3911 with 360-degree ceiling mount view and 180-degree wall mount view. Applications such as retail stores, train stations, lobbies, banks, etc, represent rather complex environments – they may have bright windows on one side and darker corners on the other side. How can one camera that looks in all directions at the same time handle it all? With the newest Superior Dynamic Range technology and 2D+3D Digital Noise Reduction, the camera is able to maintain clear 360-degree video 24 hours a day regardless of lighting conditions!<br />
KCM-3911 Key Features:<br />
   360-degree view with Ceiling mount<br />
   180-degree view with Wall mount<br />
   Panorama, ePTZ and 6-Region view modes available<br />
   Resolution up to 4-Megapixel including 1080p Full HD and<br />
   720p HD standard formats<br />
   Always clear video with Superior Dynamic range and<br />
   2D+3D DNR </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/360-degree-camera-from-acti/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome overtakes Firefox market share for the first time.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/chrome-overtakes-firefox-market-share-for-the-first-time?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=chrome-overtakes-firefox-market-share-for-the-first-time</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/chrome-overtakes-firefox-market-share-for-the-first-time#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfiffick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Boston, USA; Dublin, Ireland; Thursday, 1st December, 2011: Google&#8217;s browser Chrome overtook Firefox for the first time globally on a monthly basis in November, according to StatCounter, the free website analytics company. The firm&#8217;s research arm StatCounter Global Stats reports that Chrome took 25.69% of the worldwide market (up from 4.66% in November 2009) compared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boston, USA; Dublin, Ireland; Thursday, 1st December, 2011: Google&#8217;s browser Chrome overtook Firefox for the first time globally on a monthly basis in November, according to StatCounter, the free website analytics company. The firm&#8217;s research arm StatCounter Global Stats reports that Chrome took 25.69% of the worldwide market (up from 4.66% in November 2009) compared to Firefox&#8217;s 25.23%. Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer still maintains a strong lead globally with 40.63%.</p>
<p>&#8220;We can look forward to a fascinating battle between Microsoft and Google as the pace of growth of Chrome suggests that it will become a real rival to Internet Explorer globally,&#8221; commented Aodhan Cullen, CEO, StatCounter. &#8220;Our stats measure actual browser usage, not downloads, so while Chrome has been highly effective in ensuring downloads our stats show that people are actually using it to access the web also.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the US Internet Explorer continues to perform strongly and is maintaining market share at 50.66%, up slightly from 50.24% year on year. Firefox retains second place on 20.09%, down from 26.75%. Chrome is up to 17.3% from 10.89%. Safari is on 10.76% from 10.71%.</p>
<p>In the UK, Internet Explorer also leads the market with 42.82%. Chrome is on 24.82%, having overtaken Firefox (20.56%) in July. (For other individual country or regional analysis see StatCounter Global Stats).</p>
<p>StatCounter Global Stats are based on aggregate data collected on a sample exceeding 15 billion page views per month (4 billion from the US) from the StatCounter network of more than three million websites.</p>
<p>Further information on our analysis is available at:</p>
<p>http://gs.statcounter.com/faq</p>
<p>About StatCounter</p>
<p>StatCounter, which provides free web analytics globally, is based in Dublin, Ireland and was founded in 1999. For information on this real-time, user-friendly, and free visitor stats tool, please visit http://statcounter.com/.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/chrome-overtakes-firefox-market-share-for-the-first-time/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer&#8217;s share of web traffic drops below 50%.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/internet-explorers-share-of-web-traffic-drops-below-50?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=internet-explorers-share-of-web-traffic-drops-below-50</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/internet-explorers-share-of-web-traffic-drops-below-50#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfiffick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(Mashable) &#8212; Internet Explorer can no longer claim more than half of the web&#8217;s traffic, as of October, ending more than a decade of the default Microsoft browser&#8217;s reign.</p> <p>Safari&#8217;s hold on 62.17% of mobile traffic has reduced IE&#8217;s overall share of web browsing, despite still claiming 52.63% of desktop traffic, according to Netmarketshare.com.</p> <p>The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Mashable) &#8212; Internet Explorer can no longer claim more than half of the web&#8217;s traffic, as of October, ending more than a decade of the default Microsoft browser&#8217;s reign.</p>
<p>Safari&#8217;s hold on 62.17% of mobile traffic has reduced IE&#8217;s overall share of web browsing, despite still claiming 52.63% of desktop traffic, according to Netmarketshare.com.</p>
<p>The Microsoft browser&#8217;s diminishing share (49.6%) reflects its near absence from the realms of mobile and tablet, which now make up 6% of web traffic. However, chances are, you gave up on IE long enough ago that this milestone makes you more curious as to who actually still uses the browser.</p>
<p>As of October, Firefox is the second most popular web browser, accounting for 21.20% of traffic, followed by Google Chrome and Safari, which account for 16.60% and 8.72% respectively.</p>
<p>Chrome, which recently celebrated its third birthday, experienced the most expansion in October, increasing its share of the desktop market 1.42%.</p>
<p>Safari, the default browser in Apple&#8217;s iPhone and iPad, continues to increase its dominance over the mobile web, gaining 6.58% of the market. Safari&#8217;s share is increasing faster than the iPhone&#8217;s, probably due to how much mobile traffic is now driven by iPads.</p>
<p>As IE loses its edge on the competition, we&#8217;re curious to know which browser our readers prefer. Tell us in the comments below.</p>
<p>See the original article on Mashable.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/internet-explorers-share-of-web-traffic-drops-below-50/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duqu Virus Exploits Microsoft Windows Software Flaw.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/duqu-virus-exploits-microsoft-windows-software-flaw?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=duqu-virus-exploits-microsoft-windows-software-flaw</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/duqu-virus-exploits-microsoft-windows-software-flaw#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfiffick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reuters) &#8211; Microsoft Corp said hackers exploited a previously unknown bug in its Windows operating system to infect computers with the Duqu virus, which some security experts say could be the next big cyber threat.</p> <p>&#8220;We are working diligently to address this issue and will release a security update for customers,&#8221; Microsoft said on Tuesday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reuters) &#8211; Microsoft Corp said hackers exploited a previously unknown bug in its Windows operating system to infect computers with the Duqu virus, which some security experts say could be the next big cyber threat.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are working diligently to address this issue and will release a security update for customers,&#8221; Microsoft said on Tuesday in a short statement.</p>
<p>News of Duqu surfaced in October when security software maker Symantec Corp said it had found a mysterious computer virus that contained code similar to Stuxnet, a piece of malicious software believed to have wreaked havoc on Iran&#8217;s nuclear program.</p>
<p>Government and private investigators around the world are racing to unlock the secret of Duqu, with early analysis suggesting that it was developed by sophisticated hackers to help lay the groundwork for attacks on critical infrastructure such as power plants, oil refineries and pipelines.</p>
<p>Details on how Duqu got onto infected machines emerged for the first time on Tuesday as Microsoft disclosed its link to the infection.</p>
<p>Separately, Symantec researchers said they believe hackers sent the virus to targeted victims via emails with tainted Microsoft Word documents attached.</p>
<p>If a recipient opened the Word document and infected the PC, the attacker could take control of the machine and reach into an organization&#8217;s network to propagate itself and hunt for data, Symantec researcher Kevin Haley told Reuters.</p>
<p>He said some of the source code used in Duqu was also used in Stuxnet, a cyber weapon believed to have crippled centrifuges that Iran uses to enrich uranium.</p>
<p>That suggests that the attackers behind Stuxnet either gave that code to the developers of Duqu, allowed it to be stolen, or are the same people who built Duqu, Haley said.</p>
<p>&#8220;We believe it is the latter,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>(Reporting by Jim Finkle. Editing by Robert MacMillan)</p>
<p>Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/duqu-virus-exploits-microsoft-windows-software-flaw/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer Virus hits U.S. drone fleet.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/computer-virus-hits-u-s-drone-fleet?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=computer-virus-hits-u-s-drone-fleet</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/computer-virus-hits-u-s-drone-fleet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfiffick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(WIRED) &#8212; A computer virus has infected the cockpits of America&#8217;s Predator and Reaper drones, logging pilots&#8217; every keystroke as they remotely fly missions over Afghanistan and other warzones.</p> <p>The virus, first detected nearly two weeks ago by the military&#8217;s Host-Based Security System, has not prevented pilots at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(WIRED) &#8212; A computer virus has infected the cockpits of America&#8217;s Predator and Reaper drones, logging pilots&#8217; every keystroke as they remotely fly missions over Afghanistan and other warzones.</p>
<p>The virus, first detected nearly two weeks ago by the military&#8217;s Host-Based Security System, has not prevented pilots at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada from flying their missions overseas. Nor have there been any confirmed incidents of classified information being lost or sent to an outside source. But the virus has resisted multiple efforts to remove it from Creech&#8217;s computers, network security specialists say. And the infection underscores the ongoing security risks in what has become the U.S. military&#8217;s most important weapons system.</p>
<p>&#8220;We keep wiping it off, and it keeps coming back,&#8221; says a source familiar with the network infection, one of three that told Danger Room about the virus. &#8220;We think it&#8217;s benign. But we just don&#8217;t know.&#8221;</p>
<p>Military network security specialists aren&#8217;t sure whether the virus and its so-called &#8220;keylogger&#8221; payload were introduced intentionally or by accident; it may be a common piece of malware that just happened to make its way into these sensitive networks. The specialists don&#8217;t know exactly how far the virus has spread. But they&#8217;re sure that the infection has hit both classified and unclassified machines at Creech. That raises the possibility, at least, that secret data may have been captured by the keylogger, and then transmitted over the public internet to someone outside the military chain of command.</p>
<p>Drones have become America&#8217;s tool of choice in both its conventional and shadow wars, allowing U.S. forces to attack targets and spy on its foes without risking American lives. Since President Obama assumed office, a fleet of approximately 30 CIA-directed drones have hit targets in Pakistan more than 230 times; all told, these drones have killed more than 2,000 suspected militants and civilians, according to the Washington Post. More than 150 additional Predator and Reaper drones, under U.S. Air Force control, watch over the fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. American military drones struck 92 times in Libya between mid-April and late August. And late last month, an American drone killed top terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki &#8212; part of an escalating unmanned air assault in the Horn of Africa and southern Arabian peninsula.</p>
<p>But despite their widespread use, the drone systems are known to have security flaws. Many Reapers and Predators don&#8217;t encrypt the video they transmit to American troops on the ground. In the summer of 2009, U.S. forces discovered &#8220;days and days and hours and hours&#8221; of the drone footage on the laptops of Iraqi insurgents. A $26 piece of software allowed the militants to capture the video.</p>
<p>The lion&#8217;s share of U.S. drone missions are flown by Air Force pilots stationed at Creech, a tiny outpost in the barren Nevada desert, 20 miles north of a state prison and adjacent to a one-story casino. In a nondescript building, down a largely unmarked hallway, is a series of rooms, each with a rack of servers and a &#8220;ground control station,&#8221; or GCS. There, a drone pilot and a sensor operator sit in their flight suits in front of a series of screens. In the pilot&#8217;s hand is the joystick, guiding the drone as it soars above Afghanistan, Iraq, or some other battlefield.</p>
<p>Some of the GCSs are classified secret, and used for conventional warzone surveillance duty. The GCSs handling more exotic operations are top secret. None of the remote cockpits are supposed to be connected to the public internet. Which means they are supposed to be largely immune to viruses and other network security threats.</p>
<p>But time and time again, the so-called &#8220;air gaps&#8221; between classified and public networks have been bridged, largely through the use of discs and removable drives. In late 2008, for example, the drives helped introduce the agent.btz worm to hundreds of thousands of Defense Department computers. The Pentagon is still disinfecting machines, three years later.</p>
<p>Use of the drives is now severely restricted throughout the military. But the base at Creech was one of the exceptions, until the virus hit. Predator and Reaper crews use removable hard drives to load map updates and transport mission videos from one computer to another. The virus is believed to have spread through these removable drives. Drone units at other Air Force bases worldwide have now been ordered to stop their use.</p>
<p>In the meantime, technicians at Creech are trying to get the virus off the GCS machines. It has not been easy. At first, they followed removal instructions posted on the website of the Kaspersky security firm. &#8220;But the virus kept coming back,&#8221; a source familiar with the infection says. Eventually, the technicians had to use a software tool called BCWipe to completely erase the GCS&#8217; internal hard drives. &#8220;That meant rebuilding them from scratch&#8221; &#8212; a time-consuming effort.</p>
<p>The Air Force declined to comment directly on the virus. &#8220;We generally do not discuss specific vulnerabilities, threats, or responses to our computer networks, since that helps people looking to exploit or attack our systems to refine their approach,&#8221; says Lt. Col. Tadd Sholtis, a spokesman for Air Combat Command, which oversees the drones and all other Air Force tactical aircraft. &#8220;We invest a lot in protecting and monitoring our systems to counter threats and ensure security, which includes a comprehensive response to viruses, worms, and other malware we discover.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, insiders say that senior officers at Creech are being briefed daily on the virus.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s getting a lot of attention,&#8221; the source says. &#8220;But no one&#8217;s panicking. Yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Copyright 2010 Wired.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/computer-virus-hits-u-s-drone-fleet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Public Eye: Wise up, make sure your smart phone is protected.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/the-public-eyewise-up-make-sure-your-smark-phone-is-protected?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-public-eyewise-up-make-sure-your-smark-phone-is-protected</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/the-public-eyewise-up-make-sure-your-smark-phone-is-protected#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfiffick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With so many of us accessing the Internet or storing sensitive data on our iPhones, Droids or BlackBerrys, our mobile phones are increasingly vulnerable to cyberthieves.</p> <p>The state Office of Privacy Protection is warning consumers to protect their smart phones against the same types of dangers – hackers, viruses – that can lurk within a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With so many of us accessing the Internet or storing sensitive data on our iPhones, Droids or BlackBerrys, our mobile phones are increasingly vulnerable to cyberthieves.</p>
<p>The state Office of Privacy Protection is warning consumers to protect their smart phones against the same types of dangers – hackers, viruses – that can lurk within a big, bulky computer or laptop. </p>
<p>&#8220;We treat them like it&#8217;s only a phone, but it&#8217;s really a little computer that has the same kind of vulnerability as your PC,&#8221; said privacy office chief Joanne McNabb. </p>
<p>McNabb said consumers download apps that may not contain enough security coding to thwart hackers. </p>
<p>Or smart phone users may be unaware they need the same type of anti-virus and anti-malware protections used on their home or work computers. </p>
<p>In one case earlier this year, a mobile game, &#8220;3D Anti-terrorist Action,&#8221; inadvertently allowed hackers to rack up expensive, international phone bills on users&#8217; phones.</p>
<p>McNabb&#8217;s tips:</p>
<p>• Install the same type of software and security programs you&#8217;d want on your computer. There are mobile versions of security software from the same companies that offer products for your desktop. Or contact your phone service provider for guidance.</p>
<p>• Check out apps before downloading them. Look on review sites, such as www.whatapp.org, which rates some apps for privacy and security.</p>
<p>• Be aware. Although it&#8217;s a challenge on a small screen, read the app&#8217;s privacy policy to be sure your data aren&#8217;t being shared. Try to avoid or limit such sharing.</p>
<p>– Claudia Buck</p>
<p>Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/10/29/3141926/the-public-eye-wise-up-make-sure.html#ixzz1ZT7smoO0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/uncategorized/the-public-eyewise-up-make-sure-your-smark-phone-is-protected/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making headway against hackers?</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/network-security/making-headway-against-hackers?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=making-headway-against-hackers</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/network-security/making-headway-against-hackers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shstraub</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20073942-92/making-headway-against-hackers-week-in-review/#ixzz1QQe5oaX4" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p> <p>Law enforcement officers may feel they&#8217;ve made a dent in the fight against hackers, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be stemming the tide of activity.</p> <p>A 19-year-old U.K. man has been <a title="LulzSec suspect arrested in U.K., reports say -- Tuesday, Jun 21, 2011" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20072906-17/lulzsec-suspect-arrested-in-u.k-reports-say/">arrested on suspicion of hacking and online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20073942-92/making-headway-against-hackers-week-in-review/#ixzz1QQe5oaX4" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p>
<p>Law enforcement officers may feel they&#8217;ve made a dent in the fight against hackers, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be stemming the tide of activity.</p>
<p>A 19-year-old U.K. man has been <a title="LulzSec suspect arrested in U.K., reports say -- Tuesday, Jun 21, 2011" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20072906-17/lulzsec-suspect-arrested-in-u.k-reports-say/">arrested on suspicion of hacking and online attacks</a> by the U.K.&#8217;s Metropolitan Police. Sky News reported early on that the teenager is the mastermind behind LulzSec, a prominent hacking group that has wreaked havoc on several companies and government organizations of late. However, the Metropolitan Police&#8217;s e-Crime Unit stopped short of saying whether the man in custody might be connected to LulzSec.</p>
<p>LulzSec seemed amused by the arrest, with a cheeky post to its Twitter account that it&#8217;s still in operation. &#8220;Seems the glorious leader of LulzSec got arrested,&#8221; the group wrote on its Twitter account. &#8220;It all over now. Wait, we&#8217;re all still here! Which poor bastard did they take down?&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20073942-92/making-headway-against-hackers-week-in-review/#ixzz1QQe5oaX4">here</a>:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/network-security/making-headway-against-hackers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NATO investigating possible data breach.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/network-security/nato-investigating-possible-data-breach?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nato-investigating-possible-data-breach</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/network-security/nato-investigating-possible-data-breach#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shstraub</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20074508-83/nato-investigating-possible-data-breach/#ixzz1QQdHK1Oc">reports</a>:</p> <p>Police are investigating a possible data breach at a NATO-related Web site.</p> <p>The North Atlantic Treaty Organization said the &#8220;probable data breach&#8221; involved NATO&#8217;s e-Bookshop, a service for releasing documents to the public that&#8217;s operated by an external company. The site does not contain classified documents, <a href="http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-94608E73-1791160C/natolive/news_75729.htm">NATO said in a statement</a> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNET <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20074508-83/nato-investigating-possible-data-breach/#ixzz1QQdHK1Oc">reports</a>:</p>
<p>Police are investigating a possible data breach at a NATO-related Web site.</p>
<p>The North Atlantic Treaty Organization said the &#8220;probable data breach&#8221; involved NATO&#8217;s e-Bookshop, a service for releasing documents to the public that&#8217;s operated by an external company. The site does not contain classified documents, <a href="http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-94608E73-1791160C/natolive/news_75729.htm">NATO said in a statement</a> Thursday, adding that the site has now been blocked and subscribers have been notified.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unknown whether the attack is related to <a title="Anonymous warns NATO not to challenge it -- Thursday, Jun 9, 2011" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20070283-83/anonymous-warns-nato-not-to-challenge-it/">NATO&#8217;s recent clash with the online group Anonymous</a> after the global organization warned member nations about the rising threat of &#8220;hacktivism,&#8221; or carrying out cyberattacks for political purposes</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20074508-83/nato-investigating-possible-data-breach/#ixzz1QQdHK1Oc">Read more</a>:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/network-security/nato-investigating-possible-data-breach/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: Apple iCloud Won’t Stream Music Because of AT&amp;T and Verizon.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/technology-news/opinion-apple-icloud-won%e2%80%99t-stream-music-because-of-att-and-verizon?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=opinion-apple-icloud-won%25e2%2580%2599t-stream-music-because-of-att-and-verizon</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/technology-news/opinion-apple-icloud-won%e2%80%99t-stream-music-because-of-att-and-verizon#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shstraub</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wired <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/icloud-streaming/">reports</a>:</p> <p>You can’t use Apple iCloud yet. When you can, which should be this fall, you’ll notice something really peculiar: Unlike other music lockers, iCloud can’t stream music to you over the internet or a cellular connection. Instead, it downloads the files to your iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, or iTunes-enabled computer, where you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wired <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/icloud-streaming/">reports</a>:</p>
<p>You can’t use Apple iCloud yet. When you can, which should be this fall, you’ll notice something really peculiar: Unlike other music lockers, iCloud can’t stream music to you over the internet or a cellular connection. Instead, it downloads the files to your iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, or iTunes-enabled computer, where you can play them from local memory.</p>
<p>This was such a surprising decision by Apple that, in the heat of the moment, some journalists <a href="http://evolver.fm/2011/06/06/apples-music-icloud-is-nice-not-revolutionary/">initially reported</a> that iCloud would in fact stream music. We <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110606/google-amazon-dodge-a-bullet-apples-icloud-music-is-a-meh-but-theres-much-much-more/">weren’t the only publication</a> to fall prey to this (and we <a href="http://evolver.fm/2011/06/06/apples-music-icloud-is-nice-not-revolutionary/">posted a correction</a> nearly immediately).</p>
<p>Even today, a Google search for “iCloud streaming” returns over one million results — and yet there will be no such thing. So, why won’t Apple stream music from iCloud, when every other music locker, past and present, does?</p>
<p>For the rest of the story <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/icloud-streaming/">click here</a>:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/technology-news/opinion-apple-icloud-won%e2%80%99t-stream-music-because-of-att-and-verizon/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google confirms FTC probe, goes on defensive.</title>
		<link>http://calcompserv.com/technology-news/google-confirms-ftc-probe-goes-on-defensive?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-confirms-ftc-probe-goes-on-defensive</link>
		<comments>http://calcompserv.com/technology-news/google-confirms-ftc-probe-goes-on-defensive#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shstraub</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calcompserv.com/?p=2606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/24/technology/google_ftc/index.htm?hpt=te_bn8" target="_blank">CNNMoney reports</a>: </p> <p>Google went on the defensive about its business practices on Friday as it acknowledged that is the subject of a government probe.</p> <p>The Federal Trade Commission formally notified Google this week that it is investigating the company, Google acknowledged in a blog post. Google did not disclose the nature of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/24/technology/google_ftc/index.htm?hpt=te_bn8" target="_blank">CNNMoney reports</a>: </p>
<p>Google went on the defensive about its business practices on Friday as it acknowledged that is the subject of a government probe.</p>
<p>The Federal Trade Commission formally notified Google this week that it is investigating the company, Google acknowledged in a blog post. Google did not disclose the nature of the inquiry, and said it&#8217;s &#8220;unclear exactly what the FTC&#8217;s concerns are.&#8221;</p>
<div id="ie_column">
<div id="sharewidgets1">It&#8217;s likely an antitrust probe, as the company has been subject to many smaller antitrust investigations in the past. This one appears far more wide-reaching.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">d</span></div>
<div>For the rest of the story <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/24/technology/google_ftc/index.htm?hpt=te_bn8" target="_blank">click here</a>:</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calcompserv.com/technology-news/google-confirms-ftc-probe-goes-on-defensive/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

